Hi SeongJae, On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:03:09 -0700 SeongJae Park <s...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:53:03 -0700 SeongJae Park <s...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:01:04 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu....@sk.com> wrote: > [...] > > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:32:23 -0700 SeongJae Park <s...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:02:23 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu....@sk.com> > > > > wrote: > [...] > > > > > > I would like to hear how you think about this. > > > > So, to summarize my humble opinion, > > > > 1. I like the idea of having two actions. But I'd like to use names other > > than > > 'promote' and 'demote'. > > 2. I still prefer having a filter for the page granularity access re-check. > > > [...] > > > I will join the DAMON Beer/Coffee/Tea Chat tomorrow as scheduled so I > > > can talk more about this issue. > > > > Looking forward to chatting with you :) > > We met and discussed about this topic in the chat series yesterday. Sharing > the summary for keeping the open discussion. > > Honggyu thankfully accepted my humble suggestions on the last reply. Honggyu > will post the third version of this patchset soon. The patchset will > implement > two new DAMOS actions, namely MIGRATE_HOT and MIGRATE_COLD. Those will > migrate > the DAMOS target regions to a user-specified NUMA node, but will have > different > prioritization score function. As name implies, they will prioritize more hot > regions and cold regions, respectively.
It's a late answer but thanks very much for the summary. It was really helpful discussion in the chat series. I'm leaving a message so that anyone can follow for the update. The v3 is posted at https://lore.kernel.org/damon/20240405060858.2818-1-honggyu....@sk.com. > Honggyu, please feel free to fix if there is anything wrong or missed. I don't have anything to fix from your summary. > And thanks to Honggyu again for patiently keeping this productive discussion > and their awesome work. I appreciate your persistent support and kind reviews. Thanks, Honggyu > > Thanks, > SJ > > [...]
