On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 02:06:34PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 4/22/25 02:51, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > > Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small, > > > > and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace > > > > support. > > > > Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more > > > > convenient to use kselftest_harness.h > > > > This series provides this compatibility by adding new features to nolibc > > > > and removing the usage of problematic features from the harness. > > > > > > > > The first half of the series are changes to the harness, the second one > > > > are for nolibc. Both parts are very independent and should go through > > > > different trees. > > > > > > I need a few nolibc bits of this series (snprintf() and prep patches) to > > > base > > > further patches on. For that I'd like to pick up all the nolibc patches > > > from > > > this series through the nolibc tree. They got Acks from Willy. > > > > > > Any objections? > > > > No objection on my side! > > > > Thanks. > > Kees, do you have any comments on this series? If you are okay > with it, I would like to apply this for next.
Fine by me! :) -- Kees Cook
