On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 07:27:49PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> SC8280XP features a SLPI, much like its distant relative, SM8350.
Please get into the habit of spelling out *and* explaining internal
Qualcomm acronyms like "SLPI" so that your cover letter and commit
messages makes sense to people outside of Qualcomm.
Also say something about whether and how this is useful for anyone
currently or if it, for example, depends on Qualcomm proprietary user
space bits.
> Dmitry Baryshkov (1):
> arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s: enable sensors DSP
At first I was worried that missing firmware could cause issues here
(e.g. drivers not reaching sync state as with venus), but Lenovo has
indeed released the SLPI firmware already.
Are there any other potential downsides to enabling this (e.g. before
anyone can actually use the sensors)?
> Konrad Dybcio (4):
> dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8350-pas: Add SC8280XP
> arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Fix node order
> arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add SLPI
> arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-crd: Enable SLPI
Without firmware this results in errors like:
remoteproc remoteproc0: slpi is available
remoteproc remoteproc0: Direct firmware load for
qcom/sc8280xp/qcslpi8280.mbn failed with error -2
remoteproc remoteproc0: powering up slpi
remoteproc remoteproc0: Direct firmware load for
qcom/sc8280xp/qcslpi8280.mbn failed with error -2
remoteproc remoteproc0: request_firmware failed: -2
but enabling for the CRD reference design and requiring users (read:
developers) to copy it from Windows should be OK.
Johan
