On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 04:27:13PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Since f916dd32a943 ("arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Mandate SVE payload for
> streaming-mode state") we do not support writing FPSIMD payload data when
> writing NT_ARM_SSVE but the sve-ptrace test has an explicit test for
> this being supported which was not updated to reflect the new behaviour.
> Fix the test to expect a failure when writing FPSIMD data to the
> streaming mode register set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
> index c499d5789dd5..7e259907805b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
> @@ -301,8 +301,10 @@ static void ptrace_sve_fpsimd(pid_t child, const struct 
> vec_type *type)
>                       p[j] = j;
>       }
>  
> +     /* This should only succeed for SVE */
>       ret = set_sve(child, type, sve);
> -     ksft_test_result(ret == 0, "%s FPSIMD set via SVE: %d\n",
> +     ksft_test_result((type->regset == NT_ARM_SVE) == (ret == 0),
> +                      "%s FPSIMD set via SVE: %d\n",
>                        type->name, ret);
>       if (ret)
>               goto out;
> 
> -- 
> 2.39.5
> 

Reply via email to