On Sun, Jul 06, 2025 at 10:31:38AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote: > On 05-07-2025 10:57 p.m., Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 03:19:57PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote: > > > MSM8974 requires the CX power domain, so use the msm8996_adsp_resource > > > which has cx under proxy_pd_names and is otherwise equivalent. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <l...@lucaweiss.eu> > > > --- > > > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Hmm. You are modifying the ADSP configuration in the driver, but at the > > same time you've dropped CX supply from the MSS remoteproc. > > The qcom_q6v5_mss driver has this support for .fallback_proxy_supply, which > are used in case the power domain is not specified. > > So no driver change is necessary in the mss driver for both old and new > devicetrees, but the adsp driver does not have this fallback, so that's why > the adsp config is updated. > > Does that make it clear?
Yes. Would it make sense to implement fallback_proxy_supply for ADSP too? > > Regards > Luca -- With best wishes Dmitry
