> -----Original Message----- > From: Hansen, Dave <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, August 1, 2025 7:45 PM > To: Reshetova, Elena <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Huang, Kai > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; linux- > [email protected]; [email protected]; Mallick, Asit K > <[email protected]>; Scarlata, Vincent R > <[email protected]>; > Cai, Chong <[email protected]>; Aktas, Erdem <[email protected]>; > Annapurve, Vishal <[email protected]>; Bondarevska, Nataliia > <[email protected]>; Raynor, Scott <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] x86/sgx: Introduce functions to count the > sgx_(vepc_)open() > > On 8/1/25 04:25, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > Note: the sgx_inc_usage_count prototype is defined to return > > int for the cleanliness of the follow-up patches. When the > > EUPDATESVN SGX instruction will be enabled in the follow-up patch, > > the sgx_inc_usage_count will start to return int. > > Please use parenthesis for function_names().
Sure, will fix. > > Second, sgx_inc_usage_count() _already_ returns 'int'. Now. In this patch. > > So I'm confused what this is trying to say. > > Is this trying to say that sgx_inc_usage_count() always returns success > (0) for now, but the future implementation can fail? *That's* why it > needs to have an 'int' return type. Yes, I will rephrase this better. Best Regards, Elena.
