On Monday, 1 September 2025 17:35:23 Central European Summer Time Andy 
Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 12:33:05PM +0200, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> > +static const struct regmap_config pm886_gpadc_regmap_config = {
> > +   .reg_bits = 8,
> > +   .val_bits = 8,
> > +   .max_register = PM886_REG_GPADC_VBAT_SLP + 1,
> 
> What is this + 1 register? Why is it not defined / documented?

It is the second field of the vbat_slp channel.

> > +static int
> > +gpadc_get_resistance_ohm(struct iio_dev *iio, struct iio_chan_spec const
> > *chan) +{
> > +   struct pm886_gpadc *gpadc = iio_priv(iio);
> > +   unsigned int raw_uv, raw_ua;
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   ret = gpadc_set_bias(gpadc, chan->channel, true);
> > +   if (ret)
> > +           goto err;
> > +
> > +   ret = gpadc_find_bias_current(iio, chan, &raw_uv, &raw_ua);
> > +   if (ret)
> > +           goto err;
> > +
> > +   ret = gpadc_set_bias(gpadc, chan->channel, false);
> > +   if (ret)
> > +           return ret;
> > +
> > +   return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(raw_uv, raw_ua);
> > +err:
> > +   gpadc_set_bias(gpadc, chan->channel, false);
> 
> You do the same in the other branch and checking there for an error. Why this
> one is so special?

My rationale here was to not override the error from either the first
gpadc_set_bias() call or the subsequent gpadc_find_bias_current() call.

> > +           dev_dbg(&iio->dev, "chan: %d, raw: %d\n", chan->channel, *val);
> 
> How is this useful? The userspace gets the same value. Do you expect problems
> on its way to the user space?

That's a leftover from debugging v1, will drop.

> > +   iio->dev.of_node = dev->parent->of_node;
> 
> No, use device_set_node() with the respective parameters.
> 
> But rather debug why firmware node (or OF in your case) is not propagated from
> the parent device.

I guess it is because the IIO device is registered as a child of the
GPADC platform device, which does not have a node unlike the PMIC
device (GPADC pdev's parent). It seems that the regulator cell
registers its regulators directly under the PMIC dev, so maybe I should
do the same here with the IIO dev?

Regards,
--
Duje



Reply via email to