On 12/3/25 11:45 AM, David Heidelberg wrote: > On 03/12/2025 11:37, David Heidelberg wrote: >> On 03/12/2025 09:42, Paul Sajna wrote: >>> December 2, 2025 at 10:34 AM, "Konrad Dybcio" >>> <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]? >>> to=%22Konrad%20Dybcio%22%20%3Ckonrad.dybcio%40oss.qualcomm.com%3E > wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 12/2/25 5:41 AM, Paul Sajna wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> December 1, 2025 at 12:41 PM, "Konrad Dybcio" >>>>> <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]? >>>>> to=%22Konrad%20Dybcio%22%20%3Ckonrad.dybcio%40oss.qualcomm.com%3E > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/25/25 9:12 AM, Paul Sajna wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> It causes this warning >>>>> [ 0.000000] OF: reserved mem: OVERLAP DETECTED! >>>>> framebuffer@9d400000 mailto:framebuffer@9d400000 >>>>> (0x000000009d400000--0x000000009f800000) overlaps with >>>>> memory@9d400000 mailto:memory@9d400000 >>>>> (0x000000009d400000--0x000000009f800000) >>>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Sajna <[email protected]> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's defined for both devices that include this dtsi.. perhaps you >>>>>> could remove it from there >>>>>> >>>>>> Konrad >>>>>> >>>>> I don't have a judyp to test with and prefer to limit scope. >>>>> >>>> This is a mechanical change >>>> >>>> Konrad >>>> >>> >>> Sorry, I tried to have a look at what you meant but didn't quite >>> understand. In this patch I changed the dtsi that is included by both >>> already. I don't see any other reserved-mem nodes in judyp. Do you mean I >>> should remove the framebuffer from judyp? I don't think that's wise since a >>> panel driver isn't added as far as I know. >> >> I think this warning likely comes from sdm845-mainline repo, as it has extra >> patches, which trying to abstract framebuffer into sdm845.dtsi, where it >> likely conflicts, have you tried against clean 6.18-rcX or next? > > ... or sdm845-next repo [1]? > > I sent the patches moving framebuffer from sdm845-mainline repository as RFC > [2], but so far it's not clear to me if these should go in or not.
Ok I only did a marginal amount of grepping and judyln/judyp define framebuffer@9d400000 as the framebuffer device, while sdm845-lg-common defines memory@9d400000 as a memory region. I assumed they were all the latter. I don't see any other framebuffer@9d400000 in sdm845.dtsi so perhaps David is right.. Konrad
