On 02/01/2026 12:00, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Now I don't like that this driver is goingval |= BIT(i); writel(val, foo); // val is "altered" but not really val |= readl(foo); I didn't notice we were just doing a readback for the sake of a readback in the last revision. MDM9607 should most definitely have it too.. Perhaps I should have just read the comment
Yeah this just looks dodgy and inconsistent in this code. And anyway, why OR those bits in... --- bod

