Sasha Levin wrote: [..] > With a rule like the above, 1700+ contributors would have not been able to > send > their patch in.
Good point, I am not suggesting a Reviewed-by hurdle, but can see it reading that way. I expect that there will always be a significant class of contributions that will never need author trust to be accepted. Yes, would need to be careful not to destroy that wellspring of new contributors.
