On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 12:04:18 -0800 Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
I decided to go over it one last time. > + > +Out of Scope > +============ > + > +These guidelines do not apply to tools that make trivial tweaks to > +preexisting content. Nor do they pertain to tooling that helps with > +menial tasks. Some examples: > + > + - Spelling and grammar fix ups, like rephrasing to imperative voice > + - Typing aids like identifier completion, common boilerplate or > + trivial pattern completion > + - Purely mechanical transformations like variable renaming > + - Reformatting, like running Lindent, ``clang-format`` or > + ``rust-fmt`` > + > +Even whenever your tool use is out of scope, you should still always Somehow the above reads really weird to me. "Even whenever your tool use is out of scope". Do you mean "Even when your tool use is out of scope" ? > +consider if it would help reviewing your contribution if the reviewer > +knows about the tool that you used. > + Other than that, LGTM! Thanks, -- Steve
