On 2/9/26 2:23 AM, Chen Ridong wrote:
On 2026/2/7 4:37, Waiman Long wrote:
+static cpumask_var_t isolated_hk_cpus; /* T */
Can we get this from isolation.c instead?
The name probably shouldn't include 'hk', since it refers to the inverse
(housekeeping CPUs) of isolated CPUs, right?
The housekeeping_update() will create an inverse of the pass-in isolated
cpumasks. As for the name, I add hk to indicate this cpumask is for
passing to housekeeping_update() to update housekeeping cpumask. It is
not directly related to the cpumasks in sched/isolation.c. Please let me
know if you have a suggestion for the name.
Cheers,
Longman
