On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 10:31 AM Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ensure struct gpio_chip for gpiochip_setup_dev(). This eliminates a few > checks for struct gpio_chip. > > Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]> > --- > > -int gpiochip_sysfs_register(struct gpio_device *gdev) > +int gpiochip_sysfs_register(struct gpio_chip *chip) > { > + struct gpio_device *gdev = chip->gpiodev; > struct gpiodev_data *data; > - struct gpio_chip *chip; > struct device *parent; > int err; > > @@ -994,12 +994,6 @@ int gpiochip_sysfs_register(struct gpio_device *gdev) > if (!class_is_registered(&gpio_class)) > return 0; > > - guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu); > - > - chip = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu); > - if (!chip) > - return -ENODEV;
I think it would make sense to add lockdep checks when removing guards in non-static functions. Bart

