LIU Haoyang <[email protected]> writes: > The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is > https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not found > page, > thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, > which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. > > Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation > > For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: > > -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck > +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html > > The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the script.
I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one. But is there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE CONTENT" at the top? Thanks, jon
