On 3/10/2026 12:10 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
LIU Haoyang <[email protected]> writes:

The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is
https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not found page,
thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html,
which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page.

Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <[email protected]>
---
  Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst 
b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst
index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation
For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck
+https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html
The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the script.
I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one.  But is
there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE
CONTENT" at the top?

Dear Jon,

Unfortunately, I do not find any other documents about this script, so I have to use it even though it's obsolete.

Sincerely,
Haoyang


Thanks,

jon

Reply via email to