On 18.03.26 12:21, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2026-03-18 12:03:03 [+0100], Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Either way, that add_interrupt_randomness() should be moved to >>> sysvec_hyperv_callback() like it has been done for >>> sysvec_hyperv_stimer0(). It should be invoked twice now if gets there >>> via vmbus_percpu_isr(). >> >> No, this would degrade arm64. > > Okay. So why does this needs to be done for _this_ per-CPU IRQ on ARM64 > but not for the others? What does it make so special. >
See the other thread: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/sn6pr02mb41573332bf202dae0af79ed1d4...@sn6pr02mb4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com/ Jan -- Siemens AG, Foundational Technologies Linux Expert Center
