On Sun, Mar 22, 2026 at 02:34:59PM -0700, Jiaqi Yan wrote: > > [...snip...] > > * MF_DELAYED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed. > > nit: would it be worth correcting PG_hwpoisoned to PG_hwpoison'ed? as > there is really no "PG_hwpoisoned" page flag.
I will change PG_hwpoisoned'ed to PG_hwpoison'ed in the next version. > > - * The page is unmapped, and is removed from the LRU or file mapping. > > - * An attempt to access the page again will trigger page fault and the > > - * PF handler will kill the process. > > + * It means the page was partially isolated (e.g. removed from file mapping > > nit: what about "unmapped"? Thanks to point this out. I will change to "It means the page was unmapped and partially isolated (e.g. ..." in the next version. > > + * or the LRU) but full cleanup is deferred (e.g. the metadata for the > > + * memory, as in struct page/folio, is still referenced). Any further > > + * access to the page will result in the process being killed. > > * > > * MF_RECOVERED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed. > > * The page has been completely isolated, that is, unmapped, taken out of > > > > -- > > 2.53.0.959.g497ff81fa9-goog > > > > Reviewed-by: Jiaqi Yan <[email protected]>
