On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 2:40 PM Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:51:34 +0100 Christian Brauner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > So, I'm not happy about I_LUO_MANAGED. I don't think we need driver > > > > specific stuff in struct inode and not in i_state. Track this in the > > > > driver please. I don't want this precedent and I'd rather have you get > > Well dang, I just merged v2 but Christian wasn't cc'ed. > > > > I am planning to use an xarray in the next version. > > That's what v2 did, and I_LUO_MANAGED has gone away. > > Christian, does v2 look OK? It's at > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Yes, v2 is fine. Here, we discussed about the previous approach, this is one of the reason why v2 exists: not to modify inode, and also not to rely on inode being different for every preserved file. Thanks, Pasha > >
