On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 10:27 AM Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 08:22:43PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > Use a flexible array member with kzalloc_flex to combine allocations
> > into one.
> >
> > Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis. Move counting variable
> > assignment to right after allocation as required by __counted_by.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <[email protected]>
>
> To be honest I'd prefer that we discussed deprecating and removing ATM
> rather than cleaning it up. Is anyone using it?
Beats me.
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/atm/nicstar.c | 17 +++++------------
> >  drivers/atm/nicstar.h |  4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/atm/nicstar.c b/drivers/atm/nicstar.c
> > index 24e51343df15..2f6a3637aeab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/atm/nicstar.c
> > +++ b/drivers/atm/nicstar.c
> > @@ -867,23 +867,17 @@ static scq_info *get_scq(ns_dev *card, int size, u32 
> > scd)
> >       if (size != VBR_SCQSIZE && size != CBR_SCQSIZE)
> >               return NULL;
> >
> > -     scq = kmalloc_obj(*scq);
> > +     scq = kmalloc_flex(*scq, skb, size / NS_SCQE_SIZE);
> >       if (!scq)
> >               return NULL;
> > -        scq->org = dma_alloc_coherent(&card->pcidev->dev,
> > -                                   2 * size,  &scq->dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
> > +     scq->num_entries = size / NS_SCQE_SIZE;
> > +
> > +     scq->org = dma_alloc_coherent(&card->pcidev->dev, 2 * size, 
> > &scq->dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> >       if (!scq->org) {
> >               kfree(scq);
> >               return NULL;
> >       }
> > -     scq->skb = kzalloc_objs(*scq->skb, size / NS_SCQE_SIZE);
> > -     if (!scq->skb) {
> > -             dma_free_coherent(&card->pcidev->dev,
> > -                               2 * size, scq->org, scq->dma);
> > -             kfree(scq);
> > -             return NULL;
> > -     }
> > -     scq->num_entries = size / NS_SCQE_SIZE;
>
> AI review points out that previously the skb array was zeroed on allocation,
> which is relied on by the code. But that is no longer the case.
Will fix.
>
> --
> pw-bot: changes requested

Reply via email to