On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 02:36:35PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2026-03-26 at 07:53 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 01:46:49AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2026-03-25 at 23:20 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > checkpatch does not handle full files well when they are passed on > > > > stdin, because it does not know how to treat the text, and whether it is > > > > a C file, or a DTS file, or something else, and so it assumes that when > > > > it works with stdin it should be a unified diff. For full files it > > > > expects to have a file name as an argument and read the contents from > > > > disk. Unfortunately this does not well when trying to use checkpatch as > > > > an online linter and feed it contents of an editor buffer that have not > > > > made it to the disk yet. > > > > > > Why is this useful? > > > Why not save the buffer and then feed the file? > > > > Because when I am editing a file I am not saving it all that often. I > > want to have buffer diagnostic updated when I leave insert mode in vim. > > I believe you are able to keep your own version of checkpatch.
As well as my version of the kernel, gcc, clang, editor, git and so on. Do you have any constructive feedback? Right now checkpatch is broken when using "-f" with stdin and I offer a fix. If you have a better way in mind by all means share it. Thanks. -- Dmitry
