On 4/4/2026 4:54 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Does it also prevent users from spamming the dmesg?

It should be for no such channel case. The only remaining error logs
from pm8xxx_read_raw are timeout errors, which I don’t think would
result in immediate spamming. Or should we remove the dev_err (at
pm8xxx_read_channel_rsv) on timeout errors too?

--
Thanks,
Antony K. S.

Reply via email to