On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 2:00 AM Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> wrote: > Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 02:12:35AM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 4:55 AM Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Looks fine to me now. Do you have libteam/teamd counterpart? > > > >I don't see a need for this to be used in any of the teamd runners. > > Why do you need this then?
Initially, we plan to use a non-teamd userspace component for teaming control due to several non-standard requirements, such as synchronization with unrelated software. It is probably worth converting the teamd lacp runner to independent control at some point, because according to the spec: "It is recommended that the independent control state diagram be implemented in preference to the coupled control state diagram."
