(Resending to correct David's email address. Apologies for the noise!) On 4/22/26 18:04, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > On 4/21/26 20:30, [email protected] wrote: >> From: Pratyush Mallick <[email protected]> >> >> The current .gitignore hardcodes each generated test binary by name, >> requiring updates every time a new test is added. >> >> Switch to the patten-matching approach similar to KVM:selftests. >> Ignore everything by default and then allow source extensions (.c, .h, .sh) >> and tracked non-source files. > That looks pretty nice. Any reason for the RFC? (iow, are you unsure about > some > side-effects?)
Exactly that. I verified that the build works fine, however I sent it as an RFC just to be cautious. I wanted to get some feedback in case this might introduce some unwanted behavior that I'm not aware of. :) Thanks, Pratyush
