On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 05:33:02PM -0300, Val Packett wrote:
> The response sent by the firmware when requesting a clock vote (opcode
> AFE_CMD_RSP_REMOTE_LPASS_CORE_HW_VOTE_REQUEST) does not actually have
> the same opcode + status payload as APR_BASIC_RSP_RESULT. Rather, it
> returns one single u32 which is the client_handle that must be used in
> future unvote requests for the same clock.

Please send cover letters for your serieses, it helps tooling.  Please
also supply inter version changelogs.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to