On 5/6/26 9:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 05:33:02PM -0300, Val Packett wrote:
The response sent by the firmware when requesting a clock vote (opcode
AFE_CMD_RSP_REMOTE_LPASS_CORE_HW_VOTE_REQUEST) does not actually have
the same opcode + status payload as APR_BASIC_RSP_RESULT. Rather, it
returns one single u32 which is the client_handle that must be used in
future unvote requests for the same clock.
Please send cover letters for your serieses, it helps tooling. Please
also supply inter version changelogs.
ummm:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
I even Cc'd all(?) the lists, as usual.. Oh, sorry- not stable@ I guess.
I didn't even realize the Cc from the sign-off section would actually
immediately be used by git send-email, I thought it would only get sent
to stable when merged.
~val
