On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 03:24:24PM +0800, Fujunjie wrote: > > > On 5/12/2026 12:30 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > Yeah let's go with that then I think :) > > > Thanks Lorenzo and Jann. > > I agree that the patch as posted goes in the wrong direction by treating > source gaps as ranges that should be propagated to the destination. Please > drop this patch. > > If disallowing source gaps in this multi-VMA move path still sounds right, > I can look into a v2/new patch that rejects sparse source ranges up front > instead.
Sorry I really want to think about this a little more + make sure the semantics are sane, so I'd rather take a look at this myself. I do really hate to take something away from newer contributors but in this case things are quite fiddly so I want to make sure everything's correct :) > > Thanks, > fujunjie > Thanks, Lorenzo
