On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 11:20:33AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 05:11:28AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 10:05:02AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > What the hell is that: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > > > > > As a bot you CANNOT MAKE a Reviewer's statement of oversight. You are > > > not a damn human do be able to make such statement. You are a bot, a tool. > > > > > > > Where exactly do the rules say that ? I seem to miss that. > > > > There is a policy document about _contributions_ made by AI, but I don't > > see the one that says that AI agents must not provide Reviewed-by: tags. > > >From my perspective, AI agents must NOT use the Reviewed-by tag for the > following reasons: > > - We consider this a "person-trailer" and it implies agency > - Adding yourself to a commit via a trailer is a *binding responsibility* for > the change. A lot of tooling will cc the Reviewed-by addresses on follow-up > messages regarding code in this commit. If the address is bogus or doesn't > go to a developer, this is both wasteful and potentially frustrating.
I agree, any sort of "automated" tool shouldn't be adding these types of tags. thanks, greg k-h
