> On 3 Jun 2026, at 9:55 am, Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But there’s an alternative, more invasive, solution where the MQPRIO >> configuration is attached to the bridge itself. > > What about ports which are not attached to a bridge? They are just > standalone, have an IP address of their own, etc. That is a good point. So, barring a switch feature I’ve not yet found, I think the only options are either to drop MQPRIO offload, or to accept that ports with no MQPRIO mapping inherit the per-switch mapping. Arguably that’s the case today anyway (each chip has its own default frame priority to queue mapping), so the user should have no expectation of queue assignment on a port that hasn’t been configured. Luke
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: bridge: add 802.... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: bridge: add 802.... Nikolay Aleksandrov
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: bridge: add ... Luke Howard
- [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] net: bridge: allow MDB_FLAGS_S... Luke Howard
- [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] net: bridge: mdb: add MDB_FLAG... Luke Howard
- [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: MQPRIO su... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: ... Cedric Jehasse
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6x... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: dsa: mv8... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: dsa:... Andrew Lunn
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net:... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] ... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] ... Andrew Lunn
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] ... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] ... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: dsa: mv8... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: dsa:... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6x... Cedric Jehasse
- [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: honour MD... Luke Howard
- [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] net: bridge: convert mdb_entry... Luke Howard
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] net: bridge: convert ... Nikolay Aleksandrov

