Hello Tim,
On Wed, 2026-06-03 at 18:41 -0600, Tim Bird wrote:
> Many bluetooth source files are missing SPDX-License-Identifier
> lines. Add appropriate IDs to these files, and remove other
> license lines from the headers.
I think it would be useful to separate the changes in drivers/bluetooth
and the ones in {include/,}net/bluetooth.
Why do some of the id lines use C-style comments and others C++-style
comments? (/* */ vs. //) ?
> Leave the warranty disclaimer in files where the license ID is
> GPL-2.0 but the wording of the disclaimer is slightly different
> from that of the GPL v2 disclaimer.
>
> It is not different enough to cause licensing conflicts, but is
> kept to honor the original contributors' legal intent.
Good job doing this, do you know if there's a plan to automate this
somehow? It would be great to be able to re-run a script on top of a
codebase to verify that no sources were missed, and that we got the
same license ID assigned for the same license verbiage in the source
headers.
Cheers
