On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 04:25 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i guess my point was more: the pgtable_t typdef is new therefore it > must be defined for every architecture. your ability to directly > cross-compile and/or test a subset is great, but posting a change that > is know for a fact to break arches you didnt update seems like a bad > idea. even if you just included the obvious-but-not-compile-tested > changes and included the [EMAIL PROTECTED] alias instead would have been > better than nothing > -mike
The patch was posted multiple times on linux-arch and it has been part of -mm for 3 months. Plenty of time for the arch maintainers to notice. And without the pte_pfn_t change it would compile on a nommu architecture even without the typedef. That is why I didn't add the new typedef to the nommu archs. Which turned out to be a mistake after the pte_pfn_t change has been added but the problem is fixed with the patch sent yesterday, isn't? -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
