On Feb 9, 2008 5:56 AM, Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > i think the worst is over already and i'm reasonably sure that there are > > no more bugs in it - this _is_ a 1:1 patch after all, so in theory the > > worst side-effect should be build breakages due to include file > > spaghetti. The window for this particular breakage was just 256 commits, > > that's OK i think. > > Except for the breakage of all nommu architectures .. they need the > pgtable_t as well due to the pte_fn_t type.
so why wasnt this in the original patch ? why do no-mmu arches have to add the pgtable_t typedefs themselves ? -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
