Since the kernel's minimum gcc version is now 8.1, the workaround for a
strange gcc bug in fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy() is no longer needed.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
---
 fs/crypto/policy.c | 17 ++---------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/crypto/policy.c b/fs/crypto/policy.c
index 9915e39362db..f40fb5924e75 100644
--- a/fs/crypto/policy.c
+++ b/fs/crypto/policy.c
@@ -505,36 +505,23 @@ static int set_encryption_policy(struct inode *inode,
 int fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy(struct file *filp, const void __user *arg)
 {
        union fscrypt_policy policy;
        union fscrypt_policy existing_policy;
        struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
-       u8 version;
        int size;
        int ret;
 
        if (get_user(policy.version, (const u8 __user *)arg))
                return -EFAULT;
 
        size = fscrypt_policy_size(&policy);
        if (size <= 0)
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       /*
-        * We should just copy the remaining 'size - 1' bytes here, but a
-        * bizarre bug in gcc 7 and earlier (fixed by gcc r255731) causes gcc to
-        * think that size can be 0 here (despite the check above!) *and* that
-        * it's a compile-time constant.  Thus it would think copy_from_user()
-        * is passed compile-time constant ULONG_MAX, causing the compile-time
-        * buffer overflow check to fail, breaking the build. This only occurred
-        * when building an i386 kernel with -Os and branch profiling enabled.
-        *
-        * Work around it by just copying the first byte again...
-        */
-       version = policy.version;
-       if (copy_from_user(&policy, arg, size))
+       if (copy_from_user((u8 *)&policy + 1, (const u8 __user *)arg + 1,
+                          size - 1))
                return -EFAULT;
-       policy.version = version;
 
        if (!inode_owner_or_capable(&nop_mnt_idmap, inode))
                return -EACCES;
 
        ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);

base-commit: 83f1454877cc292b88baf13c829c16ce6937d120
-- 
2.54.0


Reply via email to