On Tue Jun 23, 2026 at 3:01 AM EDT, bot+bpf-ci wrote: >> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c >> index 2abc79dbf281..f65eff28ecd2 100644 >> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c >> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > > [ ... ] > >> @@ -12135,7 +12146,8 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env >> *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ >> >> if (regno == meta->release_regno) >> arg_type |= OBJ_RELEASE; >> - ret = check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, argno, arg_type); >> + ret = __check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, argno, arg_type, >> + btf_id_fixed_off_ok); > > This isn't a bug, but does this call need to be split across two lines? > The line length limit is 100 characters, and it looks like it would fit > on a single line:
Bot is right, we don't split diagnostics across lines. > > ret = __check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, argno, arg_type, > btf_id_fixed_off_ok); > >> if (ret < 0) >> return ret; > > > --- > AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug. > See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md > > CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/28007209948
