On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 12:48:55PM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 02:39 PM -07, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 2:33 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]> wrote:

On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 2:26 PM Michal Luczaj <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 6/24/26 22:01, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 08:03 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> >>> UDP sockets get SOCK_RCU_FREE set when (auto-)bound. This means
> >>> sk_is_refcounted(unbound) = true, while sk_is_refcounted(bound) = false.
> >>>
> >>> Because sockmap accepts unbound UDP sockets, a BPF program can increment a
> >>> socket's refcount via lookup. If the socket is subsequently bound, the
> >>> transition from unbound to bound causes bpf_sk_release() to skip the
> >>> decrement of the refcount, causing a memory leak.
> >>>
> >>> unreferenced object 0xffff88810bc2eb40 (size 1984):
> >>>   comm "test_progs", pid 2451, jiffies 4295320596
> >>>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> >>>     7f 00 00 01 7f 00 00 01 d2 04 1b b7 04 d2 00 00  ................
> >>>     02 00 01 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ...@............
> >>>   backtrace (crc bdee079d):
> >>>     kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x557/0x660
> >>>     sk_prot_alloc+0x69/0x240
> >>>     sk_alloc+0x30/0x460
> >>>     inet_create+0x2ce/0xf80
> >>>     __sock_create+0x25b/0x5c0
> >>>     __sys_socket+0x119/0x1d0
> >>>     __x64_sys_socket+0x72/0xd0
> >>>     do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x5f0
> >>>     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> >>>
> >>> Maintain balanced refcounts across sk lookup/release: (re-)set
> >>> SOCK_RCU_FREE on proto update to treat the socket (whether bound or
> >>> unbound) as not requiring a refcount increment on (a RCU protected) 
lookup.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 0c48eefae712 ("sock_map: Lift socket state restriction for datagram 
sockets")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <[email protected]>

[...]

Rejecting unhashed UDP sockets on insert to sockmap SGTM.
It is also in line with disable-problematic-cases strategy.

Agree ACK just disallow it.

Reply via email to