Ian Bridges <[email protected]> wrote: > I learned something new today, thanks. I'll use the first form in v2. > > > FORMAT_TABLES should also be FORMAT_NAMES.
No. The name is fine. > The macro is already named FORMAT_TABLES today, so that rename would > be a cleanup of pre-existing code rather than part of the strlcat > conversion. I'm happy to fold it into v2 if a maintainer is fine > including the tidy-up in this patch. No need for a v2, I mangled this patch locally already to use "%s_FOO" in FORMAT_FOO.
