On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 8:24 AM Leon Hwang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Introduce global percpu data, inspired by the commit
> 6316f78306c1 ("Merge branch 'support-global-data'"). It enables the
> definition of global percpu variables in BPF, similar to the
> include/linux/percpu-defs.h::DEFINE_PER_CPU() macro.
>
> For example, in BPF, it is able to define a global percpu variable like:
>
> int data SEC(".percpu");
>
> With this patch, tools like retsnoop [1] and bpfsnoop [2] can simplify
> their BPF code for handling LBRs. The code can be updated from
>
> static struct perf_branch_entry lbrs[1][MAX_LBR_ENTRIES] SEC(".data.lbrs");
>
> to
>
> static struct perf_branch_entry lbrs[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES] SEC(".percpu.lbrs");
>
> This eliminates the need to retrieve the CPU ID using the
> bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper.
>
> Additionally, by reusing global percpu data map, sharing information
> between tail callers and callees or freplace callers and callees becomes
> simpler compared to reusing percpu_array maps.
>
> Links:
> [1] https://github.com/anakryiko/retsnoop
> [2] https://github.com/bpfsnoop/bpfsnoop
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/arraymap.c   | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/bpf/const_fold.c |  1 -
>  kernel/bpf/fixups.c     | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c   | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> index 248b4818178c..c4e9430941e5 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> @@ -259,6 +259,37 @@ static void *percpu_array_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map 
> *map, void *key)
>         return this_cpu_ptr(array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask]);
>  }
>
> +static int percpu_array_map_direct_value_addr(const struct bpf_map *map, u64 
> *imm, u32 off)
> +{
> +       struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
> +
> +       if (map->max_entries != 1)
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +       if (off >= map->value_size)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       if (!bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn())
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +       *imm = (u64)(__force unsigned long) array->pptrs[0];
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int percpu_array_map_direct_value_meta(const struct bpf_map *map, u64 
> imm, u32 *off)
> +{
> +       struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
> +       u64 base = (u64)(__force unsigned long) array->pptrs[0];
> +
> +       if (map->max_entries != 1)
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +       if (imm < base || imm >= base + array->elem_size)
> +               return -ENOENT;
> +       if (!bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn())
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +       *off = imm - base;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /* emit BPF instructions equivalent to C code of 
> percpu_array_map_lookup_elem() */
>  static int percpu_array_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn 
> *insn_buf)
>  {
> @@ -551,9 +582,10 @@ static int array_map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map,
>                                const struct btf_type *key_type,
>                                const struct btf_type *value_type)
>  {
> -       /* One exception for keyless BTF: .bss/.data/.rodata map */
> +       /* One exception for keyless BTF: .bss/.data/.rodata/.percpu map */
>         if (btf_type_is_void(key_type)) {
> -               if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY ||
> +               if ((map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY &&
> +                    map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) ||
>                     map->max_entries != 1)
>                         return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -832,6 +864,8 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops percpu_array_map_ops = {
>         .map_get_next_key = bpf_array_get_next_key,
>         .map_lookup_elem = percpu_array_map_lookup_elem,
>         .map_gen_lookup = percpu_array_map_gen_lookup,
> +       .map_direct_value_addr = percpu_array_map_direct_value_addr,
> +       .map_direct_value_meta = percpu_array_map_direct_value_meta,
>         .map_update_elem = array_map_update_elem,
>         .map_delete_elem = array_map_delete_elem,
>         .map_lookup_percpu_elem = percpu_array_map_lookup_percpu_elem,
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/const_fold.c b/kernel/bpf/const_fold.c
> index b2a19acadb91..5787246bef30 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/const_fold.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/const_fold.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static void const_reg_xfer(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, 
> struct const_arg_info *
>                 u64 val = 0;
>
>                 if (!bpf_map_is_rdonly(map) || 
> !map->ops->map_direct_value_addr ||
> -                   map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_INSN_ARRAY ||
>                     off < 0 || off + size > map->value_size ||
>                     bpf_map_direct_read(map, off, size, &val, is_ldsx)) {
>                         *dst = unknown;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
> index 3cf2cc6e3ab6..4f84d087ca69 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
> @@ -1819,6 +1819,38 @@ int bpf_do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
>                         goto next_insn;
>                 }
>
> +               if (env->prog->jit_requested &&
> +                   bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn() &&
> +                   insn->code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW) &&
> +                   (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_VALUE ||
> +                    insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_IDX_VALUE)) {
> +                       struct bpf_map *map;
> +
> +                       aux = &env->insn_aux_data[i + delta];
> +                       map = env->used_maps[aux->map_index];
> +                       if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY)
> +                               goto next_insn;
> +
> +                       /*
> +                        * Reuse the original ld_imm64 insn, and add one
> +                        * mov64_percpu_reg insn.
> +                        */
> +
> +                       insn_buf[0] = insn[1];
> +                       insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(insn->dst_reg, 
> insn->dst_reg);
> +                       cnt = 2;
> +
> +                       i++;

oof, this was a subtle head scratcher for me.. that i++ is easy to
miss. let's update the comment to be more explicit: we are *skipping*
first half of ld_imm64, patching over second half of it with that same
half + percpu mov. All because bpf_patch_insn_data() can only replace
one 8-byte instruction, which doesn't work well for ldimm64.

Anyways, this looks correct, it just took me a bit to figure this out
and while the above comment warned me about this, it didn't really
make it any easier for figure out what's going on.

pw-bot: cr



> +                       new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, 
> insn_buf, cnt);
> +                       if (!new_prog)
> +                               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +                       delta    += cnt - 1;
> +                       env->prog = prog = new_prog;
> +                       insn      = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
> +                       goto next_insn;
> +               }
> +
>                 if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL))
>                         goto next_insn;
>                 if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 49a331c27b43..dbf76fa9d43d 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -5594,6 +5594,8 @@ int bpf_map_direct_read(struct bpf_map *map, int off, 
> int size, u64 *val,
>         u64 addr;
>         int err;
>
> +       if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_INSN_ARRAY || map->map_type == 
> BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY)
> +               return -EINVAL;
>         err = map->ops->map_direct_value_addr(map, &addr, off);
>         if (err)
>                 return err;
> @@ -6149,6 +6151,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env 
> *env, int insn_idx, struct b
>                         if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off) &&
>                             bpf_map_is_rdonly(map) &&
>                             map->ops->map_direct_value_addr &&
> +                           map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY &&
>                             map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_INSN_ARRAY) {
>                                 int map_off = off + reg->var_off.value;
>                                 u64 val = 0;
> @@ -8117,6 +8120,12 @@ static int check_arg_const_str(struct bpf_verifier_env 
> *env,
>                 return -EACCES;
>         }
>
> +       if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
> +               verbose(env, "%s points to percpu_array map which cannot be 
> used as const string\n",
> +                       reg_arg_name(env, argno));
> +               return -EACCES;
> +       }
> +
>         if (!bpf_map_is_rdonly(map)) {
>                 verbose(env, "%s does not point to a readonly map'\n", 
> reg_arg_name(env, argno));
>                 return -EACCES;
> @@ -18203,6 +18212,12 @@ static int check_and_resolve_insns(struct 
> bpf_verifier_env *env)
>                                         return -EINVAL;
>                                 }
>
> +                               if (map->map_type == 
> BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY &&
> +                                   !env->prog->jit_requested) {
> +                                       verbose(env, "JIT is required to use 
> global percpu data\n");
> +                                       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +                               }
> +
>                                 err = map->ops->map_direct_value_addr(map, 
> &addr, off);
>                                 if (err) {
>                                         verbose(env, "invalid access to map 
> value pointer, value_size=%u off=%u\n",
> --
> 2.54.0
>

Reply via email to