On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 03:59:48PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 05:18:03PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > I haven't heard anyone involved in this mail thread objecting to the > > concepts you translated into sentences below, so I think it's worth a > > try. Of course there may be objections from people who are not aware of > > this very conversation. > > To risk repeating myself - why does it all have to be in one? > > Send the non-controversial bit, get that merged so it's there, then follow it > up > with this. Simple no? :)
Sure, but I don't know what part would be the most controversial :-) I haven't heard any objection in this mail thread. > Sending this, getting it rejected, then having people's backs up because > they'll > tie the two things together seems the less politically astute move. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
