On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 01:03:51PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Christian Brauner <[email protected]> writes: > > >> Then someone can basically just merge the original patch I sent since > >> everyone seems to agree on that front. And then the extension to include > >> how the LLM was used can be discussed in a separate patch. > > > > https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] > > I still have it around :) I can apply it if that's truly the > consensus... I'll confess to having not entirely kept up with the > conversation over the holiday weekend, though, and needing to review > things. > > If you object, do let me know.
I think we need the commit message to be a cleaned up a little :) Also good to have it out there non-RFC so people know it's actually a contender for merge. So I think Christian should send a fresh non-RFC version of that with an updated commit msg + with the people here cc'd, and I'm fine with that patch going in as it is (I already gave a tag). We can always follw up with the comment stuff later (which I consider _really_ important but one thing at a time). > > Thanks, > > jon Cheers, Lorenzo
