On 2026-07-07 13:34 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On 2026-07-06 09:47:53-07:00, Farid Zakaria wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 9:01 AM Christian Brauner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ignoring the blatant bpf abuse here I think this is quite workable. So > > > this can be turned into an actual design and patch imho... > > > > Glad to see you think this proposal is in the right direction. > > Just for my edification, when you say "balatant bpf abuse", you mean > > how it abuses the socket bpf type? > > If so, do you have any guidance on a new type or should I just take a > > stab at it.
I drafted a POC for you that should be closer to how this should look like with the bpf people in Cc. I'll let you lead from now on. I just wanted to help you out and illustrate a more viable direction. Might be that the bpf people want it done differentely. Let's see.
