NXP Public
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2026 9:39 AM
> To: Shenwei Wang (OSS) <[email protected]>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>; Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>;
> Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>; Rob Herring <[email protected]>; Krzysztof
> Kozlowski <[email protected]>; Conor Dooley <[email protected]>; Bjorn
> Andersson <[email protected]>; Frank Li <[email protected]>; Sascha Hauer
> <[email protected]>; Shuah Khan <[email protected]>; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Pengutronix Kernel Team <[email protected]>; Fabio Estevam
> <[email protected]>; Shenwei Wang <[email protected]>; Peng Fan
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-arm-
> [email protected]; dl-linux-imx <[email protected]>; Arnaud
> POULIQUEN <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Andrew Lunn
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 2/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add "rpmsg"
> subnode support
> > + gpio@1 {
> > + compatible = "rpmsg-gpio";
> > + reg = <1>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + };
> > + };
>
> As I (and Arnaud) have stated before, I don't think this is the best way to
> lay out
> bindings for rpmsg-gpio nodes. I am currently thinking about a representation
> that aligns better with other virtio devices.
>
Hi Mathieu,
Would you prefer that I wait until you finalize the layout before submitting
the next version?
Shenwei
> > + };
> > };
> > ...
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
