On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 06:36:54PM +0000, Shenwei Wang (OSS) wrote: > > > > NXP Public > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2026 9:39 AM > > To: Shenwei Wang (OSS) <[email protected]> > > Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>; Bartosz Golaszewski > > <[email protected]>; > > Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>; Rob Herring <[email protected]>; Krzysztof > > Kozlowski <[email protected]>; Conor Dooley <[email protected]>; Bjorn > > Andersson <[email protected]>; Frank Li <[email protected]>; Sascha Hauer > > <[email protected]>; Shuah Khan <[email protected]>; linux- > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; > > Pengutronix Kernel Team <[email protected]>; Fabio Estevam > > <[email protected]>; Shenwei Wang <[email protected]>; Peng Fan > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linux- > > [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-arm- > > [email protected]; dl-linux-imx <[email protected]>; Arnaud > > POULIQUEN <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Andrew Lunn > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 2/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add "rpmsg" > > subnode support > > > + gpio@1 { > > > + compatible = "rpmsg-gpio"; > > > + reg = <1>; > > > + gpio-controller; > > > + #gpio-cells = <2>; > > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > > > + interrupt-controller; > > > + }; > > > + }; > > > > As I (and Arnaud) have stated before, I don't think this is the best way to > > lay out > > bindings for rpmsg-gpio nodes. I am currently thinking about a > > representation > > that aligns better with other virtio devices. > > > > Hi Mathieu, > > Would you prefer that I wait until you finalize the layout before submitting > the next version? >
Let's wait until the DT format if is finalised. > Shenwei > > > > + }; > > > }; > > > ... > > > -- > > > 2.43.0 > > >
