The API has been updated to return the more permissive -EPERM rather than -EBUSY, update the selftest to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c index 1e6abb136ffd..f780f0c7b8dd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ TEST_F(valid_modes, enable_lock_disable) ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, 0); - ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EBUSY); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EPERM); _exit(0); } @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ TEST_F(valid_modes, lock_enable) ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, variant->mode); - ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EBUSY); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EPERM); ret = prctl(PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, &mode, 0, 0, 0); ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); -- 2.47.3
