On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 12:19:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > opposite choice. Any decision here should be policy based in userspace > > based on the full system information. > Thanks for the hint. So that would mean we should do something similar > to what Lenovo does in UCM (that Val pointed to)? > https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf/blob/980fb83651e82c3e53d3a0ab7fa9b7d6fc2d809b/ucm2/Qualcomm/x1e80100/x1e80100.conf That looks plausibe, or possibly some more generic thing that teaches UCM about when to use DMI. > > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so > > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. > The original mail was from May so I figured ~ half a year would be o.k.? > Sorry I got that wrong. Note the bit in the mail about resending if you think things have been dropped.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
