On Thu, 03 Sep 2026, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:

> From: David Heidelberg <[email protected]>
> 
> The wcd934x MFD parent (a slim_device) never initializes its
> dma_mask/coherent_dma_mask. When the DT-aware children pass through
> of_dma_configure() this triggers the "DMA mask not set" warning for
> each child.
> 
> Cc: [email protected]
> Fixes: f959dcd6ddfd ("dma-direct: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference")
> Assisted-by: tencent:hy3
> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <[email protected]>

Already applied.

> ---
>  drivers/mfd/wcd934x.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wcd934x.c b/drivers/mfd/wcd934x.c
> index 3a939e7ad3da5..fc17c39791301 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/wcd934x.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/wcd934x.c
> @@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  // Copyright (c) 2019, Linaro Limited
>  
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/wcd934x/registers.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/wcd934x/wcd934x.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -212,16 +213,21 @@ static int wcd934x_slim_status(struct slim_device *sdev,
>  static int wcd934x_slim_probe(struct slim_device *sdev)
>  {
>       struct device *dev = &sdev->dev;
>       struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>       struct wcd934x_ddata *ddata;
>       struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
>       int ret;
>  
> +     ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> +     if (ret)
> +             return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> +                                  "Failed to set dma mask\n");
> +
>       ddata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ddata), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!ddata)
>               return  -ENOMEM;
>  
>       ddata->irq = of_irq_get(np, 0);
>       if (ddata->irq < 0)
>               return dev_err_probe(dev, ddata->irq,
>                                    "Failed to get IRQ\n");
> 
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 
> 

-- 
Lee Jones

Reply via email to