On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 07:38:08PM +0200, Jonas Rebmann wrote: > The existing test_string_unescape() function follows a complex procedure > where it, given a set of UNESCAPE flags, appends multiple test fragments > and predicts their unescape result for the chosen set of flags. Rename > test_string_unescape() to a more descriptive > test_string_unescape_combined > > In preparation to add simple regression tests, introduce > test_string_unescape_one() which asserts on exactly one call to > string_unescape. > > Add some tests for corner cases which already pass.
So, this is two-in-one patch change. Needs a split, but I'm not sure why we even need this. Can't your case be incorporated into the existing "combined" variant? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
