On 9/20/26 1:21 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tc9564.h
b/include/dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tc9564.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..75732fddd3025
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tc9564.h
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) */
+
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2026 by RISCstar Solutions Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ClOCK_TOSHIBA_TC9564_H__
+#define __ClOCK_TOSHIBA_TC9564_H__
+
+/* Clock IDs */
+
+#define CLOCK_MCU 0
+#define CLOCK_INTC 1
+/* #define CLOCK_PCIE 2 */
+/* #define CLOCK_I2C 3 */
Drop both, and SRAM is number 2. Or enable and implement them.
I forgot to respond to this. I think you are confused.
SRAM is BAR number 2. This is defining clock IDs.
And the reason these are commented out is that, while they
do exist, we explicitly do not want anyone to disable either
of these clocks because PCIe uses them. This clock (and
reset) control is accessed via PCIe.
I do accept that someone might want me to simply omit
these commented-out definitions, and I'd be fine with
that.
But your suggestion wasn't sensible so I wanted to clear
that up before deleting these.
-Alex
