The msr_filter_deny test covers the FILTER and UNKNOWN MSR exit
reasons, but nothing exercises KVM_MSR_EXIT_REASON_INVAL.

Have the guest write a non-canonical value to FS_BASE and verify
that the write exits to userspace with KVM_MSR_EXIT_REASON_INVAL along
with the attempted value.

FS_BASE writes are passed through to hardware, i.e. a plain WRMSR
takes #GP directly without exiting, so use forced emulation to route
the write through KVM.

Signed-off-by: Tharit Tangkijwanichakul <[email protected]>
---
v2:
 - Use a write of non-canonical to FS_BASE value instead of 
   reserved EFER bit 63 because writing non-canonical can't 
   become valid without massive architectural changes unlike EFER reserved bit
   (suggested by Sean).
Tested on Intel Core i5-10210U (VMX). Not tested on AMD.
---
 .../kvm/x86/userspace_msr_exit_test.c         | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/userspace_msr_exit_test.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/userspace_msr_exit_test.c
index 2808ce727e5f..40b084cba2c0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/userspace_msr_exit_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/userspace_msr_exit_test.c
@@ -309,6 +309,14 @@ static void guest_msr_calls(bool trapped)
        /* Invalid MSR, should always be handled by user space exit */
        GUEST_ASSERT(rdmsr(0xdeadbeef) == 0xdeadbeef);
        wrmsr(0xdeadbeef, 0x1234);
+
+       /*
+        * Writing a non-canonical value to FS_BASE is rejected by KVM, but
+        * FS_BASE writes are passed through to hardware, so force emulation
+        * to route the write through KVM and get an INVAL exit.
+        */
+       if (is_forced_emulation_enabled)
+               test_em_wrmsr(MSR_FS_BASE, NONCANONICAL);
 }
 
 static void guest_code_filter_deny(void)
@@ -627,6 +635,13 @@ static void handle_wrmsr(struct kvm_run *run)
                TEST_ASSERT(run->msr.reason == KVM_MSR_EXIT_REASON_UNKNOWN,
                            "deadbeef trap w/o inval fault");
        }
+
+       if (run->msr.index == MSR_FS_BASE) {
+               TEST_ASSERT(run->msr.data == NONCANONICAL,
+                           "MSR_FS_BASE data is not NONCANONICAL");
+               TEST_ASSERT(run->msr.reason == KVM_MSR_EXIT_REASON_INVAL,
+                           "MSR_FS_BASE trap w/o inval fault");
+       }
 }
 
 KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(user_msr, msr_filter_deny, guest_code_filter_deny)
@@ -667,7 +682,9 @@ KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(user_msr, msr_filter_deny, 
guest_code_filter_deny)
 
 done:
        TEST_ASSERT(msr_reads == 4, "Handled 4 rdmsr in user space");
-       TEST_ASSERT(msr_writes == 3, "Handled 3 wrmsr in user space");
+       TEST_ASSERT(msr_writes == (is_forced_emulation_enabled ? 5 : 3),
+                   "Handled %u wrmsr in user space, expected %u",
+                   msr_writes, is_forced_emulation_enabled ? 5 : 3);
 }
 
 KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(user_msr, msr_permission_bitmap, 
guest_code_permission_bitmap)
-- 
2.53.0


Reply via email to