On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 10:56:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 05:22:44PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 06:06:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > No functional change. > > > I don't think this is accurate, as you're changing the register into which a > > value is loaded (x0 instead of x1). > > > That seems to be correct to me, but worth calling out that you're fixing > > that up > > in the commit message and dropping this line. > > That's actually an unintentional bugfix, the original code just uses > whatever random value was in x0 as an exit code. Probably that was > non-zero so it all works out but still.
Yeah absolutely, it seems that we just got lucky before with it which is slightly ludicrous :) -- Cheers, Lorenzo
