On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 06:45 PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: >> + /* A helper such as bpf_skb_change_tail() may have downgraded the skb >> + * from CHECKSUM_COMPLETE. skb->csum is then unused by the stack and >> + * there is nothing to validate. >> + */ > > This isn't a bug, but could the opening of this multi-line comment be put on > its own line, with the text starting on the next line, as is preferred for > BPF code?
Right, will put the opening /* on its own line in v2.
