On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:19 -0800
Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/283
> 
> But, I think this patch is better than old ones.
> 
> ---
> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Reading /proc/<pid>/latency or /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/latency could
> cause NULL pointer dereference.
> 
> In lstats_open(), get_proc_task() can return NULL, in which case the
> kernel will oops at lstats_show_proc() because m->private is NULL.
> 
> This can be reproduced by the follwoing script.
> while :
> do
>       bash -c 'ls > ls.$$' &
>       pid=$!
>       cat /proc/$pid/latency &
>       cat /proc/$pid/latency &
>       cat /proc/$pid/latency &
>       cat /proc/$pid/latency
> done
> 
> And the task struct which gotten by get_proc_task() is never put.
> put_task_struct() should be called.
> 
> This patch changes the private is used to store inode, and the task
> struct will be gotten and putted in read or write function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Fine with me; Ingo please merge
Thanks for working on this!

-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to